Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 July 2009. It occurred during Ministerial statement on MG Rover.
MG Rover
My Lords, I ought to declare an interest as a former Minister who dealt with company inquiries. Is it not right that a delay is inevitable whenever company inquiries are considered? It is unusual for a delay of three to four years to take place, but not inevitable. Am I not right in thinking that every company inquiry is subject to some delay, perhaps of two or three years? Is it not also considered acceptable for the Government to take some time to consider the report, and that a period of one month should be acceptable? My final question is this: does the Minister agree that it is wholly undesirable to publish this sort of report in part? Is it not inevitable that the Government will be accused of partiality?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 712 c460
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal investigation Company investigations Company accounts Department of Trade and Industry Fraud Insolvency Sales Serious Fraud Office BMW Rover Group Phoenix Consortium
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:34:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_574729
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_574729
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_574729