Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 July 2009. It occurred during Ministerial statement on MG Rover.


MG Rover

My Lords, I ought to declare an interest as a former Minister who dealt with company inquiries. Is it not right that a delay is inevitable whenever company inquiries are considered? It is unusual for a delay of three to four years to take place, but not inevitable. Am I not right in thinking that every company inquiry is subject to some delay, perhaps of two or three years? Is it not also considered acceptable for the Government to take some time to consider the report, and that a period of one month should be acceptable? My final question is this: does the Minister agree that it is wholly undesirable to publish this sort of report in part? Is it not inevitable that the Government will be accused of partiality?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c460 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Criminal investigation Company investigations Company accounts Department of Trade and Industry Fraud Insolvency Sales Serious Fraud Office BMW Rover Group Phoenix Consortium
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk