Proceeding contribution from Peter Kilfoyle (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 July 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Ballistic Missile Defence.
Ballistic Missile Defence
Let me put the record straight. The issue of whether a country's face fits, diplomatically or internationally, is important. Everything that the Minister has just said may be the case, but there is a different attitude to the hidden weapons in Israel, for example. I am not arguing the rights and wrongs of one against the other, but there are two separate approaches to two, admittedly different, problems, even though there is the same objective difficulty about nuclear weapons.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 495 c252WH
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Defence International relations USA NATO Russia Ballistic missile defence Strategic nuclear weapons
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:45:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575308
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575308
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575308