Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 July 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

I thank all hon. Members who have contributed to the debate. As has been mentioned, in 2008 the Government consulted on proposals to replace air passenger duty with a per-plane tax. The amendment proposes that they should bring forward plans for a per-plane tax again. I assure those who tabled the amendment that the Government decided against introducing a per-plane tax at this point only after fully considering the merits of, and evidence for, such a tax. Having considered the evidence and listened to respondents, we announced in the 2008 pre-Budget report that we would instead reform the existing APD regime and change the current two-destination band structure to a four-band structure. As has already been said today and in earlier debates, that decision recognised the need for stability in the tax system in difficult economic circumstances. The reform of APD strengthens the environmental signal of the tax, and raises revenue in comparison with the existing system.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
495 c1010 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Aviation Bingo Air passenger duty Internet Powers Prosecutions Pensions Tax allowances Taxation VAT Revenue and Customs Caribbean Real estate investment trusts
Legislation
Finance Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk