Proceeding contribution from Greg Hands (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 July 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
I thank my right hon. Friend for that intervention. The correct course of action would have been for the House to vote in the Committee of the whole House for our amendment, which sought to postpone changes to the taxation of bingo until such time as both the court case and the financial implications had been resolved. Given, however, that we have voted through clause 112, which removes VAT on bingo and is the right thing to do, I cannot agree with my right hon. Friend's position—unless the Government can show that one of the amendments before us can be afforded without leaving a hole in the Red Book.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 495 c1034
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Aviation Bingo Air passenger duty Internet Powers Prosecutions Pensions Tax allowances Taxation VAT Revenue and Customs Caribbean Real estate investment trusts
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:55:37 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575978
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575978
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_575978