Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 July 2009. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
The hon. Gentleman hits the nail on the head. He will know that internment without trial, which was used for public safety reasons in Northern Ireland at a certain time in history, is not the same as a 14-day extension to 28 days with judicial oversight. A judge has to examine the case, and I am accountable to this House and to the noble Lord Carlile, who reviews these matters. The situation is entirely different, although, if I may say so, we are dealing with some of the same problems. There might well be complex, difficult cases involving detailed trails of evidence that require a level of investigation for which 14 days will simply not suffice.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 495 c1160
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Criminal investigation Detainees Police Powers Terrorism Security
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2006 (Disapplication of Section 25) Order 2009
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:46:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576401
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576401
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576401