Proceeding contribution from Bernard Jenkin (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 July 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Parliamentary Standards Bill.
Parliamentary Standards Bill
Although the Attorney-General was pretty categoric, she was not absolutely categoric. She said that""it is very unlikely that anything in the Bill would give rise to subject matter that could be interpreted by the European Court of Justice."—[Official Report, House of Lords, 20 July 2009; Vol. 712, c. 1423.]" The Attorney-General has not said "Never". If there was ever a case for belt and braces, it would seem to be this. If she had said that it could never possibly happen, the Government could legitimately oppose the amendment, but the fact that she said merely that it was "very unlikely" suggests that she holds out the possibility that it could happen.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 496 c773
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conduct Allowances Bill of Rights House of Commons EU law Members Members' interests Parliament Parliamentary privilege Sovereignty Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:04:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_580245
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_580245
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_580245