Proceeding contribution from Jack Straw (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 July 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Parliamentary Standards Bill.
Parliamentary Standards Bill
No. I am sorry, but I need to make progress. On the second point, about the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights, Lord Jenkin of Roding said:""As these"—" ECHR matters—""concern the international obligations of the UK…we could not simply assert our own constitutional arrangements as a conclusive answer."—[Official Report, House of Lords, 20 July 2009; Vol. 712, c. 1419.]" That is absolutely right. Indeed, the hon. and learned Member for Beaconsfield made exactly the same point on an intervention, when he said that such an amendment, even if it were introduced into law, could not be binding or have any impact. That is because both obligations arise in international law, under treaties that we have signed up to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 496 c778
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conduct Allowances Bill of Rights House of Commons EU law Members Members' interests Parliament Parliamentary privilege Sovereignty Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:04:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_580269
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_580269
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_580269