Proceeding contribution from David Howarth (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 4 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
In a way that is a rather disturbing answer, because clause 38 already states:""The Comptroller and Auditor General continues by that name to be a corporation sole."" I am still concerned about what the precise necessity is for the clause. It might be a belt-and-braces approach, but I still cannot see why it is necessary.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 498 c943
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Audit Costs Court of Appeal Legal profession Human rights Judiciary Expenditure Legislative competence Judicial Appointments Commission for England and Wales Medical examinations Northern Ireland Pay Public appointments National Assembly for Wales Public expenditure Ministers Limitation of actions National Audit Office Scotland Tribunals Supreme Court Resignations Auditor General for Wales Lord Justices of Appeal
- Legislation
- Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 00:20:46 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592043
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592043
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_592043