Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill [HL].


Health Bill [HL]

I am not arguing about that. I am arguing that the two-stage approach, which the Government originally favoured, was the proportionate one. If we are left with the McCartney amendment and nothing else, it will be a summary ban because it is an all-or-nothing position. That is my point. I maintain that, unless we ask the other place to think again, we will have on our hands a travesty of the parliamentary process. Without apology, I therefore beg to move. Division on Earl Howe’s Amendment Contents 82; Not-Contents 170. [See col. 638 for explanation of mistake in voting figures.] Earl Howe’s Amendment disagreed. Motion agreed. Amendment 12 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
714 c621 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Health services NHS Ophthalmic services Mental health services NHS foundation trusts Private patients Visual impairment Standards Sales Young people Regulation Tobacco Monitor Vending machines
Legislation
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk