Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill [HL].
Health Bill [HL]
I am not arguing about that. I am arguing that the two-stage approach, which the Government originally favoured, was the proportionate one. If we are left with the McCartney amendment and nothing else, it will be a summary ban because it is an all-or-nothing position. That is my point. I maintain that, unless we ask the other place to think again, we will have on our hands a travesty of the parliamentary process. Without apology, I therefore beg to move. Division on Earl Howe’s Amendment Contents 82; Not-Contents 170. [See col. 638 for explanation of mistake in voting figures.] Earl Howe’s Amendment disagreed. Motion agreed. Amendment 12 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 714 c621
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Health services NHS Ophthalmic services Mental health services NHS foundation trusts Private patients Visual impairment Standards Sales Young people Regulation Tobacco Monitor Vending machines
- Legislation
- Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:43:45 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_593540
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_593540
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_593540