Proceeding contribution from Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 November 2009. It occurred during Queen's speech debate on Energy and Climate Change and Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Energy and Climate Change and Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Does my hon. Friend not agree that, in costing nuclear power, the Government must include the huge cost—£18 billion was recently suggested—of providing the underground long-term waste storage facility? The industry will never pay for that; it just assumes that the taxpayer will pick up the bill. If that was included in the costs, it would become quite clear not only that not a penny should go to nuclear power, but that the money should go into real clean and renewable energy, which is not nuclear.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 501 c435
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Climate change Energy Electricity generation Energy supply Floods Property development Utilities Renewable energy Carbon emissions
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-08 16:28:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_596602
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_596602
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_596602