Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andy Burnham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 November 2009. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Hospital Trusts (Essex).


Hospital Trusts (Essex)

The hon. Gentleman is right to refer to the strong words from South Manchester NHS trust. I do not think that there is any debate about the data that has been used, although there is some debate about the methodology that has then been applied to that data and the resulting scores. For instance, if we look at the Basildon and Thurrock trust, it scored within expected limits on nine out of the 13 measures looked at by Dr. Foster, and it scored 98 out of 100 on one of them. I do not draw attention to that in order to dismiss the work that has been done, but it is nevertheless a complicated picture and it is not entirely clear why a score of 0 out of 100 was merited. It is important to recognise that this methodology has not been used before. It is helpful that there is a process of challenge about safety in the NHS because there always should be an ongoing dialogue about improving safety, but some trusts are, I think, justified in raising concerns about this methodology if they do not believe that it fairly reflects the standards at their trusts, especially if that portrayal gives rise to undue concern among the local community. The hon. Gentleman is right that there should be a process of interrogation of this methodology, but I am sure that that will happen in the coming days and weeks.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
501 c864-5 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Hospitals NHS Patients Monitoring NHS foundation trusts Standards Regulation Safety Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Dr Foster Monitor Care Quality Commission Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk