Proceeding contribution from John Hayes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 December 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Personal Care at Home Bill.
Personal Care at Home Bill
The shadow Secretary of State said that the issue was not just funding or organisation, but quality. My hon. Friend's intervention leads me to conclude that the problem is not only about quality, but—to go further than the shadow Secretary of State—about organisation and funding, because some the Bill's effects may be perverse. We agree with its principle, but its too limited nature may of itself be detrimental to the principle that we share. Chesterton said:""To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it"." The Government certainly have the right to introduce this legislation, but I am not sure that a politician of the distinguished status of the Minister of State, Department of Health, the hon. Member for Corby (Phil Hope) would want this Bill on his record when he could have a much better Bill if he did the thing properly.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 502 c714
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Care homes Community care Chronic illnesses Finance Fees and charges Eligibility Housing improvement Home care services Local government finance Social services
- Legislation
- Personal Care at Home Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 10:01:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_601981
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_601981
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_601981