Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Winnick (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 December 2009. It occurred during Debate on Christmas Adjournment.


Christmas Adjournment

I am grateful to my hon. Friend. Incidentally, it is interesting that Mr. Dalton said that the on-site meeting in March was "helpful and positive". If it was helpful and positive in March for one of the more junior officials to attend a meeting—perhaps not all that junior, but certainly junior to the chief executive or deputy chief executive—why would not a meeting with the chief executive himself be helpful and positive? The chief executive was not willing to turn up at the meeting in March, and one of his officials got the short straw. All in all, I hope that Ministers at the Department for Transport will pursue the matter. It could be argued that the chief executive of the Highways Agency has no role in meeting the public, but I argue that in such situations as the M6 work in my constituency and the work that my hon. Friend the Minister described, the chief executive has not acted properly. I am sure that he is an honourable person and does his duties efficiently. I do not question that in any way, but he has been insensitive, to say the least, to the plight of my constituents. That is why I have raised the issue on the Floor of the House.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
502 c984-5 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Motorways Repairs and maintenance M6
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk