Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Bribery Bill [HL].


Bribery Bill [HL]

My Lords, perhaps I may draw the noble Lord’s attention to a small point on subsection (3)(a) which refers to P bribing F, ""if, and only if … directly or through a third party, P offers, promises or gives any financial or other advantage"," and so on. Paragraph (b) says: ""F is neither permitted nor required by the written law applicable to F to be influenced in F’s capacity as a foreign public official by the offer, promise or gift"." Would it be better if it said "other advantage", because it is really referring back to paragraph (a)? Changing the wording to "gift" suggests a possible difficulty with corporate hospitality, although it is hardly a gift. I raise that as a matter that might have a slight bearing on the amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c43GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Business Corruption Advisory services Crown Prosecution Service Attorney General Foreign companies Ministerial powers Prosecutions Payments Public service Overseas companies Serious Fraud Office Revenue and Customs Bribery
Legislation
Bribery Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk