Proceeding contribution from Angela Eagle (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 January 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on IBM Pension Scheme.
IBM Pension Scheme
My hon. Friend has made his point in his characteristically laser-like manner. I am sure that IBM will be looking at what he said. However, the company meets the balance of cost in the defined benefits scheme and there is nothing to suggest that it takes it below a requirement or minimum that pension law would require. I put that on the record. Flexibility in respect of that does not take it into territory that puts it on the wrong side of regulation or the law, as the regulator has pointed out.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 503 c308WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Workplace pensions Monitoring Regulation IBM
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 22:08:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608342
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608342
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608342