Proceeding contribution from Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Bribery Bill [HL].
Bribery Bill [HL]
The passage the noble Lord has just read out shows that the noble Baroness, Lady Whitaker, is correct. The basis upon which authorisation was sought was too broad in the opinion of the Joint Committee. The passage the noble Lord has just read—I do not have the report in front of me at the moment—suggests that it thought the basis upon which authorisation was sought in the draft Bill was too wide. Authorisations are well-established in statute and in statutory provisions relating, for example, to the security services. I would have thought them to be the best way forward in this difficult area—assuming, of course, that there is a need for exemptions from the bribery provisions in respect of such services.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 716 c115GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Armed forces Corruption Intelligence services GCHQ National security Police Public interest Public service MI6 MI5 Bribery
- Legislation
- Bribery Bill (HL) 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:28:42 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608424
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608424
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608424