Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 January 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Digital Economy Bill [HL].

Digital Economy Bill [HL]

I understand the point about the Data Protection Act, which is why it is essential that a clause in this form exists. As the Minister rightly indicated, the intention of my amendment is to make clear that the name and address of the subscriber should not be disclosed. However, as subscribers are clearly being identified, if only by a number, it seems linguistic nonsense to say they are not. I have no doubt that the Minister and his officials will think about this. In the mean time, I am happy to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 80 withdrawn. Amendments 81 to 83 not moved. Amendment 84 Moved by

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c827 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Data protection Codes of practice Appeals Broadcasting Costs Computer networks Copyright Digital broadcasting Broadband Communication Fraud ICT Exemptions Intellectual property Libraries Internet Educational institutions Ofcom Radio frequencies Schools Subscriptions Internet service providers
Legislation
Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk