Proceeding contribution from Earl of Erroll (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 January 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Digital Economy Bill [HL].
Digital Economy Bill [HL]
My Lords, I will make a couple of points. In the first amendment of the group, we are trying to change "may" to "must". That is absolutely right. Parliament's job is to set the rules under which the Executive can make statutory instruments. If we only put "may", that may not happen, and we have not done our job properly. If we feel that something should be done, we should put the word "must". The rest of the comments are apposite and relevant to the business of large organisations where a few people may be breaching copyright. To penalise the whole organisation for ever would be neither cost effective nor a good use of resources.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 716 c832
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Data protection Codes of practice Appeals Broadcasting Costs Computer networks Copyright Digital broadcasting Broadband Communication Fraud ICT Exemptions Intellectual property Libraries Internet Educational institutions Ofcom Radio frequencies Schools Subscriptions Internet service providers
- Legislation
- Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-05 10:24:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610102
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610102
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610102