Proceeding contribution from Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 January 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Digital Economy Bill [HL].
Digital Economy Bill [HL]
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response, although I thought that it was a fairly limp reply and not wholly convincing. If given half the chance, I am sure that he could do better than that. Clearly, there are precedents where the Secretary of State has not had that power and where Ofcom purely has had the power. Is it not time that the Secretary of State should not have to look over the shoulder of Ofcom all the time? Is this not an example where that should be the case? We will obviously consider that extensive response in the fullness of time. But given the need to press on with further business, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 96 withdrawn. Amendment 96A Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 716 c847
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Data protection Codes of practice Appeals Broadcasting Costs Computer networks Copyright Digital broadcasting Broadband Communication Fraud ICT Exemptions Intellectual property Libraries Internet Educational institutions Ofcom Radio frequencies Schools Subscriptions Internet service providers
- Legislation
- Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-05 10:24:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610154
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610154
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_610154