---

Bribery Bill [HL]

I am most grateful to the Minister. I do have a quick question. He referred to case 1 and case 2, in which: ""P offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to another"." If P "offers" and "promises", he is obviously initiating or playing a very active part in the criminal conduct. But if it has been demanded of him in circumstances which in ordinary language, although not probably in legal language, would be thought to constitute either extortion or duress, does he have a guilty mind when he gives it? If he had offered it, promised it and initiated it, I can see that. But is there not a distinction with giving it? As the Minister will confirm, unfortunately extortion, which has been removed from the statute book, nor duress, offers a defence.