Proceeding contribution from Andrew Rosindell (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 4 February 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Crime and Security Bill (Ways and Means).
Crime and Security Bill (Ways and Means)
Yes, that was rather surprising, and I hope that she will come back at the end of the debate and address the whole range of questions to which the public need an answer. The provisions have major positive implications for those whose vehicles are clamped by cowboy clampers, but they also have financial implications for Government expenditure, as well as raising questions about any legal fees that might flow from them and about what the public might have to pay. There is also a possibility of local authorities having to spend money in this respect. These issues really need explanation, and I am surprised that the Minister has brushed them all aside and failed to address them at the start of this important discussion.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 505 c480
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Appeals Crime Costs Fees and charges Immobilisation of vehicles Private sector Motor vehicles Public finance Terrorism Victims
- Legislation
- Crime and Security Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:31:27 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_619228
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_619228
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_619228