Proceeding contribution from Andrew Rosindell (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 4 February 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Crime and Security Bill (Ways and Means).
Crime and Security Bill (Ways and Means)
I think my hon. Friend makes a valid point. I hope that the Minister has got the message at this stage—that those present in the House today feel that more detail should be given. How can we, as the House of Commons, make a judgment when so little information has been provided? I understand that the basis of the motion is financial, but to assess whether any financial motion should be approved, we need to understand how it will work in practice. The Minister will take the opportunity, I hope, to answer these questions and allay the concerns that many of our constituents may have. May I also ask the Minister how much will be paid into the Consolidated Fund? How does she expect to recoup any of these costs? This involves taxpayers' money, so we need to know the answer to that question. Who, indeed, would pay the legal fees of those clamped but found innocent? Where would the money to deal with all of this come from?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 505 c482
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Appeals Crime Costs Fees and charges Immobilisation of vehicles Private sector Motor vehicles Public finance Terrorism Victims
- Legislation
- Crime and Security Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 10:10:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_619238
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_619238
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_619238