Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 February 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Access to the Countryside (Coastal Margin) (England) Order 2010.
Access to the Countryside (Coastal Margin) (England) Order 2010
I am reassured to hear the Minister say that he considers that on golf courses the path will have its narrowest definition. Under the Bill at the moment, even with existing rights of way, the whole golf course might be added to the existing right of way as a form of access land. The question is what will be allowed as a definable boundary. Would it have to be something physical and impenetrable or just something visible?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 717 c165GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Conservation Coastal areas Countryside Dogs Golf Public footpaths
- Legislation
- Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000
- Access to the Countryside (Coastal Margin) (England) Order 2010
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:49:08 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620995
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620995
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620995