Proceeding contribution from Sally Keeble (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 26 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill.
Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill
Does my hon. Friend accept that the arrangements relating to the wind-down of banks that were required as a result of the credit crunch—which led to criticism from Opposition Members—were necessary because the public could not continue to underwrite the UK banks' losses in an unsustainable way? There is a similar argument for initiating an orderly wind-down of the debts of developing countries. Again, this would protect the interests of British taxpayers, who are having to underwrite those losses as well.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 506 c576
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Debts Developing countries Debts written off Heavily indebted poor countries initiative Liberia Zambia Vulture funds
- Legislation
- Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:57:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624756
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624756
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624756