Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 March 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2010.
Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2010
My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for giving way. Could he not deal with the noble Earl’s point about the seven who absconded, admittedly before the noble Lord’s time, and the point that I made in relation to AF? A year ago, they were regarded as highly dangerous; today, AF is at large. Is the risk being contained or not? If it is, why can it not be contained in relation to the other 11 controlees?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 717 c1540
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Costs Advocacy Human rights National security Terrorism Surveillance Anti-terrorism control orders Freedom of association
- Legislation
- Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2010
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:07:44 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626267
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626267
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_626267