Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord West of Spithead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 March 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2010.


Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2010

My Lords, as I mentioned in my previous summing-up, our position is that control orders should be imposed for as short a time as possible, commensurate with the risk that is posed by the person in question. The High Court has supported our view. When the new Labour Government come in, I shall advise them that we should review and consolidate all counterterrorism legislation. I am sure that control orders would be part of that. However, it would be wrong at the moment to have an arbitrary end point to an order; it surely has to be based on the risk that the individual poses. As I said, we would be putting the country at risk if we did not do that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c1545-6 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Costs Advocacy Human rights National security Terrorism Surveillance Anti-terrorism control orders Freedom of association
Legislation
Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2010
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk