Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Child Poverty Bill.


Child Poverty Bill

I am most grateful to the Minister. I drew the analogy because if we cannot find ways to help the poor—and poor children in particular—then that is the bill we will face in 2020. That is the point. It is the context in which one starts to look at interventions. If one does not have effective interventions then that is the bill at the end of the road. That is the reason I used the juxtaposition. As I said, this is an important issue. That is why I raised it as an amendment. In light of the response, I beg leave to withdraw it. Amendment 17 withdrawn. Amendment 18 not moved. Amendments 19 to 20 not moved. Clause 9 : Provision of advice by Commission and consultation with others Clause 9 : Provision of advice by Commission and consultation with others Amendment 21 not moved. Amendment 22 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c223 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Carers Costs Advisory services Housing benefit Housing Health Drugs Low incomes Northern Ireland Parents Poverty Public consultation Misuse Nutrition Mental health Parental responsibility Scotland Social security benefits Social rented housing Malnutrition Child Poverty Commission
Legislation
Child Poverty Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk