Proceeding contribution from Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 March 2010. It occurred during Estimates day on Road Users (Taxes and Charges).
Road Users (Taxes and Charges)
There are two separate issues, one of which is the regional imbalance. I have some sympathy—as does the Select Committee, I think—with the view that there has been a regional imbalance as regards how much is spent on London, in particular, compared with other parts of the country. However, the thrust of the right hon. Gentleman's argument—that motorists are paying for the rail network—fails to take account of other factors such as the need to reduce carbon emissions, the social benefits of investing in rail, and wider Government policies of social inclusion. Moreover, investment in the rail network encourages people to shift from road to rail, thereby freeing up the roads for those who are obliged to use them, so the motorist also benefits from investment in the rail network. There has to be a sensible balance.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c373
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Capital investment Community transport Fees and charges Expenditure Excise duties High speed trains Motor vehicles Railways Carbon emissions Road traffic Roads Rural areas Taxation Repairs and maintenance Road traffic control Tolls
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-11-21 15:15:29 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629196
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629196
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629196