Proceeding contribution from David Lammy (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 March 2010. It occurred during Opposition day on Higher Education.
Higher Education
I have already said to the hon. Gentleman and I have already said in this House that we are absolutely committed to the science funding ring-fence and remain so. Let us return to the subject of this motion, which is our 50 per cent. aspiration. It is not clear but a transformation has apparently been undertaken by the hon. Member for Havant. My concern is that the right hon. Member for Witney (Mr. Cameron) is, as is the case on many things, much less clear about the 50 per cent. aspiration. He once went on record saying that his party opposed the aim and, most recently, he was asked about it on Mumsnet and he did not answer the question. So it is not really clear whether the Conservatives are genuine about this aspiration and commitment. I know that a former shadow spokesman, the Mayor of London, said:""In the words of every saloon-bar analysis of higher education of the last 10 years, what we need is fewer graduates and more plumbers"." That was their position then and I suspect that it is their position now.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c803-4
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Applications Apprentices Finance Higher education Qualifications Loans Standards Universities Training Students
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:32:20 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631415
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631415
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631415