Proceeding contribution from Stephen Williams (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 March 2010. It occurred during Opposition day on Higher Education.
Higher Education
Perhaps the hon. Gentleman was not listening too carefully to what I said earlier about that proposal being a costed proposal. Indeed, all of the quite limited number of extra-expenditure provisions that the Liberal Democrats will put forward in our manifesto for the forthcoming election are costed proposals. Each of those proposals, whether for the pupil premium, tax cuts for the low-paid or the phasing out of tuition fees, is fully costed. We have identified where all the money is going to come from, whether it is from refocusing tax credits, removing higher-rate tax relief for pension contributions or one of many other examples that I could cite. Those examples will be quoted in full, as they always have been in every general election that I have fought as a candidate going right back to 1992.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c812
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Applications Apprentices Finance Higher education Qualifications Loans Standards Universities Training Students
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:32:01 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631461
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631461
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631461