Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Stephen Williams (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 March 2010. It occurred during Opposition day on Higher Education.


Higher Education

I am fully aware of that. Schools in my hon. Friend's constituency, in the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for Cheltenham (Martin Horwood), in my constituency, Bristol, West, and more importantly, in constituencies all round the country where there are disadvantaged children will be direct beneficiaries of our pupil premium policy. It is by investment in education in schools or FE colleges that we will drive up attainment at 16 and increase progression to 18, so enabling more people to participate in higher education. That is the point that I have always made—to return to the Minister's intervention about the 50 per cent. target. The logical result of our pupil premium policy is that more people from a socially disadvantaged background will have the opportunity to participate in higher education, and then the numbers will naturally rise. It is more credible to have a policy that drives up attainment and participation, rather than to set a futuristic target and expect everything to flow through in order to meet it. Our policy will be fully funded and it will be set out clearly in our manifesto alongside our other proposals.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
507 c816 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Applications Apprentices Finance Higher education Qualifications Loans Standards Universities Training Students
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk