Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Sally Keeble (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill.


Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill

No, I will not. The hon. Gentleman's colleagues on the Front Bench, who have behaved entirely properly throughout this process, have described the measure as a sunset clause, and so it is. It was their measure, and they also got in the measure for making the Bill permanent. If the clause were taken out, the effect would be that the Bill would continue for more than one year. There has to be an annual vote on it, because there is no provision for anything else. I asked in the Library and, in the short time available, the only Acts that we could think of that are so demanding of parliamentary time and attention that they have to be renewed annually are terrorism legislation and the Finance Acts. I am sure that the hon. Member for Gainsborough, who is the Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee and is therefore very concerned about efficiency and proper functioning, would think that, important though the Bill is, it is not on the same level as terrorism legislation or the Finance Acts, but that would be one effect of his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
508 c1046 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Debts Developing countries Debts written off Sunset clauses
Legislation
Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk