Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Stephen Timms (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Digital Economy Bill [Lords].


Digital Economy Bill [Lords]

I will not give way. I need to make a bit more headway before I give way again. It is right that we ask the industry to help to educate consumers and—as the hon. Member for Bath (Mr. Foster) rightly suggested—to develop the kind of attractive commercial deals that consumers want, at a price that they are willing to pay. However, we need legislation as well. Turning to amendment 36, I think it appropriate that we should ask an internet access subscriber to be responsible for trying to ensure that their access is not used for unlawful purposes. That is what the current wording of the Bill does. Perfectly proper concerns have been expressed about children downloading material unlawfully. I remind the House that, under the clause, a letter would be sent to the person responsible for the internet access, to inform them that unlawful downloading had occurred. It would be a matter for them to ensure that their internet access was safeguarded. Sending a letter is entirely appropriate in such circumstances.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
508 c1122 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Disclosure of information Capital investment Copyright Broadband ICT Infrastructure Intellectual property Internet Ofcom Telecommunications Regulation Taxation Internet service providers
Legislation
Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk