Proceeding contribution from Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 April 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
Yes. I am sure that I am on the edge of breaking a rule by intervening a third time, but as regards every service provided, from dustbins through to economic regeneration, in what sense does the noble Baroness think that this is not money well spent? On that basis, would she say not only that we should not pay people so much, but that we should provide fewer services as well? Is that the doctrine that is now being suggested?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c1684
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Civil liberties Alcoholic drinks Banks Borrowing Cider Incentives Excise duties Interest rates Economic situation Individual savings accounts National insurance Personal savings Pay Pensions Postal services Public sector debt Taxation Tax rates and bands Telephone services Unemployment Second homes
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:00:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_638412
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_638412
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_638412