Parliamentary Search

Debate on bill on Thursday, 8 April 2010, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Myners. The answering member was Baroness Noakes.

Finance Bill

Finance Bill. Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committee negatived. Standing Order 47 having beeen dispensed with, the Bill was read a third time and passed.

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
718 c1677-90 
Session
2009-10
Department
Treasury
Legislative stage
Third reading
Second reading
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Related items
Finance Bill. Brought from the Commons.
Wednesday, 7 April 2010
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 718 c1680 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I want to take this opportunity in the gap to raise two matters. The first relates to the ...
Show all contributions (18)
Lord Myners | 718 c1677-80 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, as my right honourable friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer said when he delivered his B...
Baroness Noakes | 718 c1682-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we usually take an opportunity of a debate on the Finance Bill to debate the Budget which ...
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 718 c1681-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am delighted to do so; the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, made a very good point. ...
Lord Lea of Crondall | 718 c1683 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Baroness. So this so-called jobs tax is going to create unemployment, as ...
Lord Lea of Crondall | 718 c1683 (Link to this contribution) It is very rare to intervene twice, but it is a new definition of an efficiency saving to include a ...
Baroness Noakes | 718 c1683 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Lea, raises a question that people often get confused about. They think that ta...
Lord Lea of Crondall | 718 c1684 (Link to this contribution) Yes. I am sure that I am on the edge of breaking a rule by intervening a third time, but as regards ...
Baroness Noakes | 718 c1684 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord is quite right that procurement savings form part of our strategy. However, we have n...
Lord Myners | 718 c1686-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we have had a short but interesting debate and I thank all noble Lords who have contribute...
Baroness Noakes | 718 c1684-6 (Link to this contribution) There are parts of the public sector that are unproductive. I was not referring to front-line servic...
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 718 c1684 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I promise that I shall say this only once. Is the noble Baroness seriously saying that nur...
Baroness Noakes | 718 c1684 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I do not wish to prolong this. We have not said that we will cut front-line services, and ...
Lord Myners | 718 c1688-9 (Link to this contribution) I am making the point that it is not —I was going to say "possible to make overly simplistic extrapo...
Baroness Noakes | 718 c1688 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, if the Chancellor believed that, why did he tell the Treasury Select Committee in another ...
Lord Sheikh | 718 c1689 (Link to this contribution) Can the Minister say whether the employers and the heads of the various companies, when making a sta...
Lord Myners | 718 c1689-90 (Link to this contribution) I am very aware of the statement made. I think there is a sleight of hand here in the way in which t...
Subjects
Civil liberties Alcoholic drinks Banks Borrowing Cider Incentives Excise duties Interest rates Economic situation Individual savings accounts National insurance Personal savings Pay Pensions Postal services Public sector debt Taxation Tax rates and bands Telephone services Unemployment Second homes
Legislation
Finance Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk