Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hanham (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 June 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government Bill [HL].
Local Government Bill [HL]
I thank my noble friend for his intervention. He is correct. A large number of questions were raised. As I said at the beginning, it was one of the most withering reports that I have read. I think that we should let it rest at that for the moment. The question of judicial review was originally raised as a possibility by the Permanent Secretary when he was demanding categoric instructions to allow the unitaries to go forward. Judicial review became possible because they were orders, so it was a judgment not on a parliamentary decision, but on secondary legislation that arose from primary legislation. The judge was quite clear in what he said and has quashed the first article of the orders. The second article, which relates to the elections, has yet to be decided, and presumably will be so decided at the next hearing of the court on 5 July. How much of the Bill proceeds depends on what happens there, and we will move amendments accordingly.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 719 c1832-3
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Cost effectiveness Devon Finance Exeter Local government Norfolk Norwich Reorganisation Unitary councils Suffolk Hybrid bills Devon County Council Exeter City Council Norfolk County Council Norwich City Council
- Legislation
- Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:12:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651207
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651207
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651207