Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Leslie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 July 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HC) and Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

The hon. Gentleman makes a fair point. I have tried to define "banking institutions" by referring to the Banking Act 2009. I believe that I would thus exclude the building societies and other more mutual, co-operative institutions that I would not regard as being as culpable as the plc-based financial institutions. Irrespective of whether a particular bank received a direct sum from the taxpayer, all those banking institutions benefited from the implicit and implied safety net that the taxpayer provided. Were it not for that underwritten implicit guarantee, banks such as Barclays and others would have been in significant trouble. They may not have taken the handout themselves, but had the markets not felt that the Government of the day were prepared to act were they so requested or had it been necessary to do so, all those banking institutions would have been in an entirely different position.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
513 c717 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Companies Capital gains tax Corporation tax Banks Investment Financial institutions Profits Tax rates and bands Revenue and Customs Small businesses Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Tax evasion Tax yields Bank levy
Legislation
Finance Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk