Proceeding contribution from Alan Johnson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 July 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
The right hon. Gentleman is making a very effective case. Can he explain why, in last year's debate on this issue, he voted for the continuation of 28 days? His party abstained but he made the point in that debate that he could not accept 14 days, which he is now advocating, precisely because he knew inside details of Operation Overt and what happened at Heathrow. What changed his mind during the ensuing year?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c1014
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Criminal investigation Detainees Police Powers Terrorism Security
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2006 (Disapplication of Section 25) Order 2010
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:40:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655690
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655690
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_655690