Proceeding contribution from Baroness Shephard of Northwold (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 July 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Local Government Bill [HL].
Local Government Bill [HL]
I apologise to the noble Lord for intervening again—he has accepted interventions with great grace—but I ask him to consider how the mess was made. I ask him to consider also that Members opposite were warned what might happen if the orders were quashed. I quote from the debate in this House on 22 March when his noble friend Lord McKenzie was asked whether it would result in electoral chaos if the orders were quashed. The noble Lord replied: "““In relation to the elections that did not take place, the councillors would cease to hold office as a result and vacancies would have to be filled in the normal course of events””.—[Official Report, 22/3/10; col. 827.]" That could, of course, have been prevented. I do not recall and Hansard does not record the noble Lord or the noble Baroness protesting about the nature of that response from the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, on that day.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 720 c718
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Councillors Costs Devon Elections Judgements District councils Exeter Local government Local government finance Local government services Norfolk Norwich Reorganisation Unitary councils Suffolk Norfolk County Council Norwich City Council
- Legislation
- Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:08:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656001
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656001
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_656001