Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 September 2010. It occurred during Backbench debate on Strategic Defence and Security Review.


Strategic Defence and Security Review

The in-principle debate about whether to embark on the programme was held in 2007, and the final opportunity for the public, Parliament or anybody else to debate whether we pass the point of no return, as it were, on the successor programme is at main gate, and of course there will be debate about that. In terms of what is going on this autumn, the value-for-money study will feed into the SDR and the comprehensive spending review, and, if it is possible to get better value for money out of the programme, it is only right and proper that we do so.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c1054 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Defence equipment Manufacturing industries Public expenditure Procurement Ministry of Defence Submarines Trident Cuts Strategic Defence and Security Review
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk