Proceeding contribution from Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 September 2010. It occurred during Backbench debate on Strategic Defence and Security Review.
Strategic Defence and Security Review
I rather agreed with the right hon. Member for Coventry North East, who said that that point is largely academic: the cost all comes out of the Treasury as a whole, and the particular line on which it is accounted is neither here nor there. We would want to be clear that the funds for Trident were on a separate line from that of the core defence budget. That is what the White Paper said, and as I understand it, that is still the position. However, where precisely it is accounted is neither here nor there; it is a completely semantic and academic point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c1055
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Defence equipment Manufacturing industries Public expenditure Procurement Ministry of Defence Submarines Trident Cuts Strategic Defence and Security Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:34:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_665370
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_665370
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_665370