Proceeding contribution from Julian Lewis (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 September 2010. It occurred during Backbench debate on Strategic Defence and Security Review.
Strategic Defence and Security Review
If that is the case and we are meant to discount the story, will the Minister just confirm one thing? When he talks about possible decisions about main gate in the context of value for money, does he accept that no interpretation of a value-for-money assessment could result in a decision that the Trident replacement should not go ahead at all?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c1055-6
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Defence equipment Manufacturing industries Public expenditure Procurement Ministry of Defence Submarines Trident Cuts Strategic Defence and Security Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:34:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_665377
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_665377
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_665377