Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on Bloody Sunday Inquiry.


Bloody Sunday Inquiry

The noble Lord got the third one. He does not want to know about the first and second ones. Reference was made to the private all-party briefings. Those will commence; I spoke to the Secretary of State about them and he is happy to come along. We will endeavour to arrange one of those meetings before too long. I want to say this about the contribution from the noble Lord, Lord Tebbit. He has a personal position as a victim and because his concern is about an event in Brighton it is not covered by any procedures such as the HET. There is very much a serious case. It was interesting that he followed the noble and learned Lord, Lord Carswell, with an entirely opposite view, because it was that of the victim saying, ““No, I can’t yet move on””. I would like to find a way of moving on. I believe that there ought to be a way—I do not know what it might be—in which even the noble Lord, Lord Tebbit, can eventually move on, because he feels that he has had some satisfaction. In one sense—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
721 c581 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Criminal investigation Death Demonstrations Army Costs Northern Ireland Northern Ireland government Public inquiries Terrorism Training Bloody Sunday Tribunal of Inquiry Londonderry Parachute Regiment Historical Enquiries Team Consultative Group on the Past
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk