Proceeding contribution from Keith Simpson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 21 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government Bill [Lords].
Local Government Bill [Lords]
I am thoroughly enjoying listening to the hon. Gentleman's speech and looking at the expression on the face of his Whip. He talks about gerrymandering and various other matters. The main reason the then Secretary of State turned down Norwich's original bid was that, on its current boundaries, it did not meet all the economic and regeneration criteria, yet, four years later, it was accepted. Can he explain why an argument that had been knocked down was accepted by a new Secretary of State four years later?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 516 c1185
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Devon Exeter Local government Norfolk Norwich Reorganisation Unitary councils Suffolk
- Legislation
- Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:31:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_671727
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_671727
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_671727