Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Superannuation Bill.
Superannuation Bill
I am struggling with why, once we have Clause 1, which removes the requirement for consent, there is any requirement for anything else to be a fallback in Clause 2 with the underpinning of Clause 3. If Clause 1 takes away the need for consent and puts in place proper consultation, what is the necessity for any other part of this Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 721 c1151
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Civil servants Workplace pensions Redundancy pay Redundancy Trade unions Public and Commercial Services Union Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Superannuation Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:31:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_672863
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_672863
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_672863