Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Richard (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Documents Bill.


Identity Documents Bill

My Lords, I have taken no part in the debates concerning the Bill. Indeed, when I came in here this afternoon, I did not think I was going to take part in it today. However, I have listened to this debate and I find myself in total agreement with the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss. It seems to me that, from looking at this as objectively as one can, this is an issue about the continuity of government. The identity cards were not sold on the basis of, ““You are buying it from a Labour Government, but if another one come in, things may change and you may have to renegotiate it””. The contract—if it was a formal contract—was with the Government, and it is the Government who are now reneging on the contract. I feel very uneasy about it and I hope the Minister will take this back and have another look at it. It is interesting, listening to this debate, that the only person, I think, who has suggested that what the Government are proposing should take place was the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee. Everybody else seems unanimously against the Government’s position. There is a famous dictum about a hole—I do not need to repeat it. This seems to be an occasion when the Government should think very hard.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c789 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Databases Costs Identity cards Personation National identity register Reviews
Legislation
Identity Documents Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk