Proceeding contribution from Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 November 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Justification Decision (Generation of Electricity by the EPR Nuclear Reactor) Regulations 2010.
Justification Decision (Generation of Electricity by the EPR Nuclear Reactor) Regulations 2010
The question I was asking about judicial review or possible legal action was not on whether the case were robust. I have read all the documents and I am sure the Minister is convinced that his case and the work undertaken have been robust. The point was specifically whether legal actions would significantly delay the process beyond 2017. He may want to check on that. If there were legal actions, would that delay the process?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c831
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Decommissioning Electricity generation Radioactive waste Nuclear power stations Safety Waste management Nuclear reactors
- Legislation
- Justification Decision (Generation of Electricity by the AP1000 Nuclear Reactor) Regulations 2010
- Nuclear Decommissioning and Waste Handling (Designated Technical Matters) Order 2010
- Justification Decision (Generation of Electricity by the EPR Nuclear Reactor) Regulations 2010
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:33:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682894
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682894
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682894