Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 29 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].


Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]

I rise to support the noble Lord, Lord Barnett, and possibly to bring to the Minister’s attention the fact that when the Monetary Policy Committee was established, a specific committee of your Lordships’ House was established for the sole purpose of reviewing the way in which that committee worked. There can be no issue of propriety about whether the House of Lords should have a role here. This raises a broader question about the coalition’s view of the role of the House of Lords on financial and economic matters. The previous Government and the former Prime Minister were almost implacably opposed to this House having anything to do with economic affairs, which I thought was a pity because there is clearly expertise here. Last week, we discussed ways in which the House of Lords might play a part in tax policy-making. That would be very sensible as well and it would form part of the piece, along with these amendments, under which the House of Lords would have an enhanced role.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c102GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Audit Fiscal policy Economic situation Economic policy Forecasts Public expenditure Parliamentary scrutiny Public finance Office for Budget Responsibility
Legislation
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk