Proceeding contribution from Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 29 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]
I almost agree with the noble Lord, Lord Turnbull, but it would strike me as slightly odd if at this stage, when the office is being established as the definitive independent forecaster on which the Government are going to base their actions, the Government retained the right the disagree with the OBE and carry on as though it did not exist. In terms of the central forecast, it would be a bit like having a dog and barking yourself. Perhaps the Minister can give us an example of a circumstance in which the Government envisage they might invoke that right.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 722 c111GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Audit Fiscal policy Economic situation Economic policy Forecasts Public expenditure Parliamentary scrutiny Public finance Office for Budget Responsibility
- Legislation
- Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:51:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_686560
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_686560
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_686560