Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 December 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL].


Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, has already referred to the fact that I did not support the OBR carrying out an assessment of its own forecasts, as set out in Clause 4. I stick by that view, for the reasons that the noble Lord has given. However, I cannot support his amendment because, without another amendment, it would take out of the Bill a requirement for any assessment of the accuracy of OBR forecasts. I do not understand why the noble Lord has not grouped this amendment with later ones that would set up a peer review committee to perform this function. It would be a retrograde step simply to take out of the Bill a requirement for an analysis of the accuracy of the OBR’s fiscal and economic forecasts. I would rather have an unsatisfactory review than none at all.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c13GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Audit Cost effectiveness Budgets Economic situation Forecasts Public finance Research Office for Budget Responsibility
Legislation
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk